Hafez's Influence on Khajavi Kermani in Romantic and Mystical Illustrated Themes, Based on Gerard Genet's Intertextual Theory

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Candidate, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Neishabour Branch, Islamic Azad University, Neishabour, Iran.

2 PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Neishabour Branch, Islamic Azad University, Neishabour, Iran.

10.22034/ias.2020.252989.1394

Abstract

Hafez is one of the most prominent Persian language poets. In order to strengthen his poems, he paid special attention to the works of the past, among which we can mention the poems of Khajooye Kermani. Khajoo and Khajeh have spoken many times on various issues, including lyrical and mystical issues, in the verse of the Divan of Ghazals. In this research, using the foundations of Genet's intertextual theory, the fields of intellectual and verbal similarities of the two poets in the scope of these topics have been investigated. The research method is descriptive-analytical and with a comparative approach. The results of the research indicate that Hafez's influence on Khajoo in the field of lyrical and mystical issues has been mainly of the hidden-intentional type and literary-artistic theft (copying and transfer / metamorphosis and exaggeration). The most important lyrical variable seen in the lyric poems of the two poets is related to the relationship between the lover and the beloved. Of course, Hafez, in connection with epistemological and mystical issues, has also paid attention to his Kermani counterpart. In general, it should be said that in most cases, Hafez, without mentioning Khajoo or mentioning the poet's reference to him by mentioning a sign, took the word and meaning from him and reflected it in his lyric poems. Also, it has been revealed that the main subtext of some verses is the Qur'an, from which both Khajoo and Khajeh have borrowed the principles of this divine book and strengthened their poetry.

Keywords


Allen, G. (2001). Intertextuality, (Payam Yazdan-khah, trans.). (third ed.), Tehran: Center. [In Persian]
Ahmadi, B. (2009). Text structure and interpretation. (eleven ed.), Tehran: Center. [In Persian]
Anonymous. (2011). An introduction to intertextuality; theories and applications, Tehran: Sokhan. [In Persian]
Anonymous. (2015). Intertextuality from structuralism to postmodernism, Tehran: Sokhan. [In Persian]
Ghanouni, Ha. (2016). Comparative study of the tree and its place in the poetry of Hafez and Khajoui Kermani. Lyric Language and Literature Studies, (25), pp. 52-41. [In Persian]
Hafez Shirazi, Kh. Sh. M. (2010). Divan, edited by Mojtaba Minavi and Qasim Ghani, Tehran: Talayeh. [In Persian]
Homai, J. (2010). Rhetoric techniques and literary industries, Tehran: Ahura. [In Persian]
Jurjani, A. (1984 AH). Al Taarifat. by Ebrahim Abiari, Beirut: Bi-Na. [In Arabic]
Jalali Pendri, Y. (2006). Hakim Sana'i and Qalandraneh's sonnets. a collection of riotous articles in Ghazni; Thoughts and works of Hakim Sanai, by Mahmoud Fatuhi and Ali Asghar Mohammadkhani. Tehran: Sokhan. [In Persian]
Khorasani, A. T. (1998). Bab al Shaitan Mankitab al Shajarah. edited by Madelong and Walker, Netherlands: Brill.
Khorramshahi, B. (2015). Hafez's mind and language. Tehran: Nahid. [In Persian]
Khajovi Kermani, K. A. A. (1990). The Book of Poems. edited by Ahmad Soheili Khansari, (second ed.), Tehran: Pazhang. [In Persian]
Khaleghi, P. (2015). Khajo, the fundamental factor in the creation of Hafez's sonnets. People's era, (57 & 58). [In Persian]
Khatami Kashani, S. (2007). Formalist criticism of Khajou and Hafez's Ghazals, considering Hafez's influence on Khajoui Kermani, Master's thesis of Al Zahra University, Sohaila Salahi-Moghadam. [In Persian]
Kristeva, J. (2010). Shared individuality. (Mehrdad Parsa, Trans.), Tehran: Rozbahan. [In Persian]
Mirzaei, P.; & Sattarzadeh, F. (2017). Stylistological comparison of a ghazal by Khajoui Kermani with a ghazal by Hafez Shirazi. Literary Sciences, (14), pp. 189-173. [In Persian]
Miqdadi, B. (1999). Dictionary of terms of literary criticism (from Plato to the present age), Tehran: Fekr Rooz. [In Persian]
Namvar motalaq, B. (2007). Transtextuality, the study of the relationships of one text with other texts. Human Sciences, (56), pp. 83-98. [In Persian]
Razmjo, H. (2006). Literary types and their works in Persian. Mashhad: Ferdowsi University. [In Persian]
Shamisa, S. (2013). Literary types, (Five ed.), Tehran: Mitra. [In Persian]
Shahrashtani, M. b. A. A. (1962 AH). Al-Mallal e Nahl, by Mohammad Seyed Kilani, Beirut: Dar al Marafa. [In Arabic]