Islamic Art Studies

Islamic Art Studies

Reviewers Responsibilities

The Journal of Islamic Art Studies uses expert reviewers in the field of research to submit articles. To access the responsibilities of the reviewers, please consider the following link:

(http://publicationethics.org/files/u7140/Peer%20review%20guidelines.pdf)

 

To improve the level of review, please pay attention to the following points:

  1. Review manuscript critically but constructively and preparing detailed comments about the manuscript to help authors improve their work
  2. Review multiple versions of a manuscript as necessary
  3. Providing all required information within established deadlines
  4. Making recommendations to the editor regarding the suitability of the manuscript for publication in the journal
  5. Declaring to the editor any potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authors or the content of a manuscript they are asked to review
  6. Reporting possible research misconducts
  7. Suggesting alternative reviewers in case they cannot review the manuscript for any reasons
  8. Treating the manuscript as a confidential document
  9. Not making any use of the work described in the manuscript
  10. Not communicating directly with authors, if somehow they identify the authors
  11. Not identifying themselves to authors
  12. Not passing on the assigned manuscript to another reviewer
  13. Ensuring that the manuscript is of high quality and original work
  14. Informing the editor if he/she finds the assigned manuscript is under consideration in any other publication to his/her knowledge
  15. Writing review report in English only in English manuscripts
  16. Authoring a commentary for publication related to the reviewed manuscript.

 

What should be checked while reveiewing a manuscript?

  1. Novelty
  2. Originality
  3. Scientific reliability
  4. Valuable contribution to the science
  5. Adding new aspects to the existed field of study
  6. Ethical aspects
  7. Structure of the article submitted and its relevance to authors’ guidelines
  8. References provided to substantiate the content
  9. Grammar, punctuation and spelling
  10. Scientific misconduct.