نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق کیفری و جرمشناسی، واحد امارات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، امارات.
2 دکتری تخصصی، استادیار گروه حقوق، دانشکده علوم قضایی و خدمات اداری، تهران، ایران.
3 دکتری تخصصی، استادیار گروه حقوق، واحد تهران مرکز، دانشگاه ازاداسلامی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
In the criminal procedure law approved in 2012, useful measures have been taken in the field of execution of sentences and in the discussion of respecting the rights of convicts and convicts and monitoring prisoners. The purpose of criminal proceedings is to establish the occurrence of the crime and its attribution, the realization of the criminal responsibility of the accused, and the punishment or preventive and educational measures for the convicted person to be implemented in a timely manner so that no criminal remains unpunished and uncorrected in the society. Execution of the sentence, lack of access to the place of residence and residence of the convicted person, failure to introduce the convicted person for the execution of the sentence by a guarantor or surety, the imprisonment of the imprisoned person or obstacles of judicial origin can be mentioned as the lack of monitoring document, warning and failure to obtain appropriate security. Also, the judge rules on the implementation of corporal punishment crimes, including death penalty, corporal punishment, amputation and whipping, negative and restrictive punishment of freedom, rights and dignity, including imprisonment and exile, deprivation of residence in the border zone, and dismissal or exclusion from the country and habitation. Mandatory at a certain point or financial punishment, including fines, confiscation, repossession and destruction of property, and the case is not closed until the sentence is executed. The current research was carried out using descriptive and analytical method and relying on data from library sources. The findings of the research indicate that today there is more supervision in the field of ethics on the execution of punishment, while the judicial courts of painting schools indicate the speed of action and the legal weakness and self-centeredness of the king in the execution of punishment.
Research aims:
1. Examining the ethical mechanisms in the execution of punishment by the magistrate.
2. Analyzing how to judge and penalize in Iranian painting.
Research questions:
1. What ethical mechanisms are performed by the judge in the execution of punishment?
2. What information can be obtained from Iran's painting concerning judicial courts and execution of punishment?
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)