مطالعات هنر اسلامی

مطالعات هنر اسلامی

نقش جنسیت درمدل ادراک دانشجویان معماری با تکیه بر ماهیت جایگاه زنان در معماری معاصر ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه معماری، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران
2 گروه معماری و شهرسازی دانشگاه تهران، ایران
3 گروه معماری واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران
10.22034/ias.2023.377365.2124
چکیده
یکی از دغدغه‌های مهمی که معماران برای آن تلاش می‌کنند مسئلۀ آموزش معماری به دانشجویان تازه‌کار است، تا جایی‌که هر روز روشی نوین را برای ارتقا و بهبود شیوۀ آموزشی مدارس معماری پیشنهاد می‌دهند؛ اما تاکنون روشی که بتواند تفکر طراحی را بر پایۀ تفکیک جنسیتی ادراک با واسطۀ ذهنیت و عینیت آموزش دهد در دنیا بررسی نشده است و نگارندگان تلاش می‌کنند این تفاوت‌ها را در طراحی پارامترهای تعیین‌شدۀ فرم و فضا بیابند و نشان دهند که در دو مرحلۀ تصور و تجربۀ برخورد دانشجویان هنگام طراحی‌کردن چگونه است. این مطالعه با جمع‌آوری اطلاعات و پیشینۀ مکتوب و مصاحبۀ عمیق و آزمایشی نیمه‌تجربی را از 180 نفر دانشجویان با حجم نمونه 122 نفر به عمل آورد و با فن pre- test- post تلاش می‌کند تا به سؤال تحقیق پاسخ دهد؛ و پارامترهای تأثیرگذار بر روند شکل‌گیری دیسیپلین تفکر از مسیر ذهنیت و عینیت با رویکرد تفکیک جنسیتی تمایز ادراک را با هدف شناخت الگوی رفتاری دانشجویان موردبررسی قرار دهد. نتایج نشان می‌دهد دانشجویان در هنگام طراحی باواسطۀ تصور به‌صورت اتفاقی و تجزیه و ترکیب با موضوع برخورد می‌کنند اما بعد از تجربۀ بدنمند به‌صورت درک خودآگاه و تجزیه‌وتحلیل به مسئله‌های طراحی پاسخ خواهند داد.
اهداف پژوهش:

تبیین پارامترهایی مؤثر بر الگو و معیاری منسجم از تجربۀ کارگاه طراحی معماری را در راستای عینیت و ذهنیت.
شناسایی تمایز جنسیتی ادراک دانشجویان و به حداقل رساندن آن هنگام مواجهه با موضوع طراحی.

سؤالات پژوهش:

تفاوت جنسیتی ادراک دانشجویان هنگام تفکر طراحی با واسطۀ تجربۀ بدنمند و تصور بر مبنای کدام کیفیات طراحی فرم و فضا چگونه می‌باشد؟
تفاوت جنسیتی ادراک دانشجویان چگونه منجر به رفتار تفکر طراحی آن‌ها می‌شود؟
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

The role of gender in the perception model of architecture students based on the nature of the position of women in contemporary Iranian architecture

نویسندگان English

Seyed Kasra Mirpadyab 1
Iraj Itsam 2
Jamal Aldin Soheyli 3
1 Department of Architecture, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University of Qazvin, Iran
2 Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Architecture.Qazvin Branch. Islamic Azad University of Qazvin, Iran

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Teaching architectural thinking
the gender difference in perception
embodied experience
lived experience
خانبان‌زاده، ساناز؛ ارمغان، مریم و سهیلی، جمال‌الدین. (1399). «بررسی نقش زنان معماری در معماری معاصر ایران (1320-1357)». زن در فرهنگ و هنر. شماره 1، 20-1.
عزیزی، فاطمه. (1399). «نقش زنان در معماری معاصر ایران». مطالعه جغرافیا، عمران و مدیریت شهری، دوره6، شماره2، 168-154.
Ahrentzen, S. & Anthony, K. H. (1993). Sex, stars, and studios: A look at gendered educational practices in architecture. Journal of Architectural Education, 47(1), 11-29.
Appleyard, D. (1969). Why buildings are known: A predictive tool for architects and planners. Environment and Behavior, 1(2), 131-156.
Badiou, A. (2013). Rhapsody for the Theatre: Verso Books.
Bodin Danielsson, C., & Theorell, T. (2019). Office employees’ perception of workspace contribution: A gender and office design perspective. Environment and Behavior, 51(9-10), 995-1026.
Bostock, D. (2008). Space, Time, Matter and Form: Essays on Aristotle’s Physics. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia, 23(2), 247-249.
Botteldooren, D., & De Coensel, B. (2009). The role of saliency, attention and source identification in soundscape research. Paper presented at the INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings.
Carmona, M., Heath, T., Tiesdell, S., & Oc, T. (2010). Public places, urban spaces: the dimensions of urban design: Routledge.
Ching, F. D. (2014). Architecture: Form, space, and order: John Wiley & Sons.
Crossley, N. (2012). Merleau-Ponty, medicine and the body. In Contemporary theorists for medical sociology (pp. 97-113): Routledge.
Cuthbert, A. R. (2008). The form of cities: Political economy and urban design: John Wiley & Sons.
Ergan, S., Radwan, A., Zou, Z., Tseng, H.-a., & Han, X. (2019). Quantifying human experience in architectural spaces with integrated virtual reality and body sensor networks. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 33(2), 04018062.
Fish, J., & Scrivener, S. (1990). Amplifying the mind's eye: sketching and visual cognition. Leonardo, 23(1), 117-126.
Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507-537.
Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition: Psychology Press.
Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of thought: MIt Press.
Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity research journal, 4(2), 123-143.
Hague, C., & Jenkins, P. (2004). Place identity, planning and participation: Routledge.
Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American psychologist, 53(4), 449.
Hannah, G. G. (2002). Elements of design: Rowena Reed Kostellow and the structure of visual relationships: Princeton Architectural Press.
Harding, S. G. (1986). The science question in feminism: Cornell University Press.
Henshaw, V., & Bruce, N. (2012). Smell and sound expectation and the ambiances of English cities.
Holmes, M. (2008). Gender and everyday life: Routledge.
Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self‐competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child development, 73(2), 509-527.
Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1989). The visual environment: Public participation in design and planning. Journal of social issues, 45(1), 59-86.
Kockelmans, J. J. (1985). Heidegger on art and art works (Vol. 99): Springer Science & Business Media.
Koolhaas, R. (1991). Seminar 1/21/91'in R. Koolhaas 1996, Conversations with Students. ed. S. Kwinter, Houston, Texas: Rice University School of Architecture and …,
Lang, J. (1998). Öğrenciler için mimarlığa giriş: temel tasarım dersini yeniden düşünmek. Derleyen: N. Teymur., Aytaç Dural (Eds.), Temel Tasarım/Temel Eğitim Sempozyumu içinde, Ankara: ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Yayını.
Lang, J. (2002). Creation of architectural theory: the role of behavioral sciences in environmental design, translated by Alireza Einifar. University of Tehran publications institute.
Lang, J. T. (1974). Designing for human behavior: architecture and the behavioral sciences (Vol. 6): Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
Laverty, S. M. (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International journal of qualitative methods, 2(3), 21-35.
Leonardo, Z. (2003). Interpretation and the problem of domination: Paul Ricoeur's hermeneutics. Studies in philosophy and education, 22(5), 329-350.
Mahdzar, S. S. S., & Safari, H. (2014). Legibility as a result of geometry space: Analyzing and comparing hypothetical model and existing space by space syntax. Life Science Journal, 11(8), 309-317.
Maitland, S. B., Intrieri, R. C., Schaie, W. K., & Willis, S. L. (2000). Gender differences and changes in cognitive abilities across the adult life span. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 7(1), 32-53.
Makaryk, I. R. (1993). Encyclopedia of contemporary literary theory: Approaches, scholars, terms (Vol. 22): University of Toronto Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Donald A. Landes, London and New York: Routledge.
Mourshed, M., & Zhao, Y. (2012). Healthcare providers' perception of design factors related to physical environments in hospitals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 362-370.
Mulligan, K., Calder, A., & Mulligan, H. (2018). Inclusive design in architectural practice: Experiential learning of disability in architectural education. Disability and health journal, 11(2), 237-242.
Nadimi, H. (1996). Conceptualizing a framework for integrity in architectural education: with some references to Iran. University of York,
Nagy, G., Watt, H. M., Eccles, J. S., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2010). The development of students' mathematics self‐concept in relation to gender: Different countries, different trajectories? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 482-506.
Pakzad, J., & Bozorg, H. (2012). An introduction to environmental psychology for designers. Tehran, Armanshahr.
Pallasmaa, J. (2012). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses: John Wiley & Sons.
Pease, A., & Pease, B. (2016). Why Men Don't Listen & Women Can't Read Maps: How to spot the differences in the way men & women think: Hachette UK.
Philippou, S. (2001). On a paradox in design studio: Teaching or the centrality of the periphery. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Architectural Education Exchange Conference. Retrieved from http://cebe. cf. ac. uk/aee/sessions/dis4b. html.
Piotrowski, A., & Robinson, J. W. (2000). The discipline of architecture: U of Minnesota Press.
Rodaway, P. (2002). Sensuous geographies: body, sense and place: Routledge.
Salama, A. M. (2012). Evaluation research as a mechanism for critical inquiry and knowledge construction in architectural and urban education. FORMakademisk, 5(2).
Stevenson, D. (2003). Cities and urban cultures: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Teymur, N. (1994). Initiation myths and curricular fallacies. Beginnings in Architectural Education, New York: ACSA/EAAE, 89-90.
Tonkiss, F. (2005). Space, the city and social theory: Social relations and urban forms: Polity.
Usman, M., Haworth, B., Berseth, G., Kapadia, M., & Faloutsos, P. (2017). Understanding spatial perception and visual modes in the review of architectural designs. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation.
Von Meiss, P. (2013). Elements of Architecture: From Form to Place+ Tectonics: EPFL Press.
Watt, H. M. (2004). Development of adolescents' self‐perceptions, values, and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th‐through 11th‐grade Australian students. Child development, 75(5), 1556-1574.
Weber, R., Choi, Y., & Stark, L. (2002). The impact of formal properties on eye movement during the perception of architecture. Journal of Architectural and planning research, 57-69.
Williamson, T. J., Williamson, T., Radford, A., & Bennetts, H. (2003). Understanding sustainable architecture: Taylor & Francis.
Wong, W. (1993). Principles of form and design: John Wiley & Sons.
Yang, W., Moon, H. J., & Kim, M.-J. (2018). Combined effects of short-term noise exposure and hygrothermal conditions on indoor environmental perceptions. Indoor and Built Environment, 27(8), 1119-1133.
Yorg, G. (1996). Aesthetics in architecture. Trans by Jahnshad Pakzad, Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press.
Zeisel, J. (2006). Inquiry by design. Environment/behavior/neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape, and planning.
Zevi, B., Gendel, M., & Barry, J. A. (1957). Architecture as Space. How to look at Architecture.